WebSocket endpoint as Singleton EJB

By default …

… a WebSocket implementation creates a new (server) endpoint instance per client. In case you need a single instance, you can implement this using a custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator (by overriding the getEndpointInstance method)

The catch: you might have to sacrifice some of the (Java EE) platform related services like dependency injection and interceptors

More details here

Alternate solution ?

A similar behavior can be achieved by decorating the WebSocket endpoint with @Singleton

This approach has the caveat of not being a standard feature outlined by the spec (although injection of EJBs as well as interceptors support is clearly mentioned in the Java WebSocket spec Sec 7.1)

Concurrency semantics ?

In case of a @Singleton, all the clients will interact with the one-and-only server endpoint instance. Here is a quick summary of how the EJB as well as WebSocket threading semantics are applied

  • The Singleton bean default approach WRITE lock ensures single threaded access across all connected clients
  • If thread-safety is not a concern (e.g. in case where you do not deal with client specific data/state in your logic) and in case the single-threaded access model proves to be a bottleneck, override the default behavior by switching to a READ lock which allows concurrent threads to access the methods (unless of course a WRITE lock is not already in effect)

Note: The above mentioned semantics are with respect to ALL the WebSocket clients. From the point of view of a single client, the default strategy of one thread at a time, per endpoint instance per client continues to apply (more details here)

Further reading..

Cheers!

Advertisements

About Abhishek

Loves Java EE, distributed KV stores and messaging systems. Frequently blogs at abhirockzz.wordpress.com as well as simplydistributed.wordpress.com. Oh, I have also authored a few (mini) books, articles, Refcards etc. :-)
This entry was posted in Java, Java EE and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to WebSocket endpoint as Singleton EJB

  1. Dimitris says:

    Dear Abhishek,
    I have to deploy a Websocket @ServerEndPoint in the EJB level (jar), so I have used the Singleton’s approach. The problem is that, the singleton websocket endpoint is not discoverable by the clients (Response code was not 101: 404). Should the Websocket being deployed in a war file or is there any alternative? Please Advice. Thanks In Advance.

    Like

    • Abhishek says:

      Yes. The WebSocket endpoint needs to be deployed in a WAR file (as it is a web component). In fact you can deploy EJB in WAR files too. You are not forced to have a structure with an EAR, EJB JAR and different WAR files (although you can do that as well)

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s