Binding strategies for JAX-RS filters and interceptors

JAX-RS 2.0 defines multiple ways using which server side filters and interceptors can be bound to their target components.

  • Global Binding
  • Named Binding
  • Dynamic Binding

Global Binding

By default, JAX-RS filters and interceptors are bound to all the methods of resource classes in an application. That is, both request (pre and post) and response filters will be invoked whenever any resource method is invoked in response to a HTTP request by the client. This convention can be overridden using named binding or dynamic binding.

Named Binding

Filters and interceptors scoping can be handled in a fine-grained manner (based on per resource class/method)


NoteIf it is applied to a class, the filter/interceptor will be bound to all its resource methods

Dynamic Binding

JAX-RS provides the DynamicFeature interface to help bind filters and interceptors dynamically at runtime. They can be used in tandem with the more static way of binding made possible using@NamedBinding

The injected instance of the ResourceInfo interface helps you choose the resource method in dynamic fashion by exposing various methods and the FeatureContext interface allows us to register the filter or interceptor once the resource method has been selected.

For more on JAX-RS 2.0 …


About Abhishek

Currently working as a Senior Product Manager in the Oracle Cloud Application Development team with a focus on Oracle Cloud PaaS portfolio. When not hovering in the clouds, I stay grounded with Java EE
This entry was posted in Java EE and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Binding strategies for JAX-RS filters and interceptors

  1. Tushar Goel says:

    Hi Abhishek, thanks for the article. I am new to REST and have limited exposure. By default interceptor and filters are applied on each request and response, so as you are saying if we use some custom annotation like you mention then we limit the calling of filter in each request/response. Only those methods which are having this annotation will be treated. Right?


    • Abhishek says:

      Hey Tushar. Thanks for reading !
      You’re correct. If you use the Named or Dynamic binding strategy, you can override the default behaviour and apply the filter/interceptor in a declarative/selective/criteria-driven manner


      • Tushar Goel says:

        Thanks Abhishek for revert. Static binding is easy to understand but i am having hard time to understand Dynamic binding. Could you please explain little bit more about it?


  2. Abhishek says:

    Tushar, in the Dynamic binding case

    1. ResourceInfo interface helps you drill down on the ‘criteria’ for binding
    2. After your criteria is met, FeatureContext interface allows you to actually ‘bind’ or register the filter/interceptor

    Makes sense ?


  3. Tushar Goel says:

    Thanks Abhishek.. Actually, i am not aware of ResourceInfo and FeatureContext interface.. I will read them first and then get back to this article. I think then only it will make more sense to me.


  4. Great article! Read and put it in practice already.

    But I’m facing a problem.
    When I use dynamic binding and my dynamic filter HeaderAdminValidatorFilter isn’t annotated (neither Provider or named binding @AdminAudited) it work very well, but when my HeaderAdminValidatorFilter is annotated with @Provider and @AdminAudited, other methods (which are filtered by other named binding filter) are being filtered too.
    And if my other filte HeaderValidatorFilterr (which is named bindind @Audited) annotated with @PreMatching, my method (which is filtered by dynamic filter) is also being intercepted, so I had to replace the @PreMatching by @Priority in order to execute it before the other filter (HeaderAppendFilter).

    I tested it in Wildfly 8.1 and 10.0, both FINAL.

    Can you tell me if I did something wrong?

    Here is the project:

    Thank you!


  5. Pingback: Sharing data between JAX-RS filters | Thinking in Java EE (at least trying to!)

  6. Pingback: Sharing Data Between JAX-RS filters | Voxxed

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s